Strategic communication, knowledge management, and public learning

Practical resource ยท case

Case study interview guide for development programs

Helps communication teams collect context, stakeholder voice, implementation detail, evidence, and lessons before drafting a case study.

Purpose

What this resource helps a team do

Helps communication teams collect context, stakeholder voice, implementation detail, evidence, and lessons before drafting a case study.

The resource is intended to create a consistent decision trail. It helps a communication or program team identify what information is needed, who is responsible for it, what should be reviewed, and how the final output will serve its audience.

Resource components

What to include

01

Problem framing

Document the relevant inputs, decisions, evidence, responsibilities, and review notes for this component.

02

Stakeholder prompts

Document the relevant inputs, decisions, evidence, responsibilities, and review notes for this component.

03

Evidence questions

Document the relevant inputs, decisions, evidence, responsibilities, and review notes for this component.

04

Quote guidance

Document the relevant inputs, decisions, evidence, responsibilities, and review notes for this component.

05

Follow-up checklist

Document the relevant inputs, decisions, evidence, responsibilities, and review notes for this component.

Suggested workflow

Use the resource in four passes

1. Scope

Define the audience, activity, decision, deadline, evidence available, and owner before completing the resource.

2. Capture

Record source material, stakeholder input, consent, context, and unresolved questions while they can still be verified.

3. Review

Check accuracy, completeness, representation, attribution, accessibility, and alignment with program requirements.

4. Reuse

Store the final record so it can support reports, briefs, stories, presentations, and future planning.

Quality standard

Completion check

  • The intended audience and decision are explicit.
  • Claims can be traced to a source, observation, record, or named stakeholder input.
  • Consent, attribution, and sensitive context have been reviewed.
  • Responsibilities and unresolved follow-up actions are visible.
  • The final record can be understood and reused by someone outside the original activity.

Expected outcome: A stronger interview record that supports accurate, ethical, and useful impact dossiers.

Frequently asked questions

When should this resource be used?

Helps communication teams collect context, stakeholder voice, implementation detail, evidence, and lessons before drafting a case study.

What does the resource include?

Problem framing, Stakeholder prompts, Evidence questions, Quote guidance, Follow-up checklist.

What outcome should it support?

A stronger interview record that supports accurate, ethical, and useful impact dossiers.