Strategic communication, knowledge management, and public learning

Practical resource ยท case

Stakeholder story consent and ethics note

Supports respectful storytelling by clarifying consent, representation, risk, attribution, and approval before publication.

Purpose

What this resource helps a team do

Supports respectful storytelling by clarifying consent, representation, risk, attribution, and approval before publication.

The resource is intended to create a consistent decision trail. It helps a communication or program team identify what information is needed, who is responsible for it, what should be reviewed, and how the final output will serve its audience.

Resource components

What to include

01

Consent language

Document the relevant inputs, decisions, evidence, responsibilities, and review notes for this component.

02

Risk questions

Document the relevant inputs, decisions, evidence, responsibilities, and review notes for this component.

03

Attribution options

Document the relevant inputs, decisions, evidence, responsibilities, and review notes for this component.

04

Image-use notes

Document the relevant inputs, decisions, evidence, responsibilities, and review notes for this component.

05

Approval steps

Document the relevant inputs, decisions, evidence, responsibilities, and review notes for this component.

Suggested workflow

Use the resource in four passes

1. Scope

Define the audience, activity, decision, deadline, evidence available, and owner before completing the resource.

2. Capture

Record source material, stakeholder input, consent, context, and unresolved questions while they can still be verified.

3. Review

Check accuracy, completeness, representation, attribution, accessibility, and alignment with program requirements.

4. Reuse

Store the final record so it can support reports, briefs, stories, presentations, and future planning.

Quality standard

Completion check

  • The intended audience and decision are explicit.
  • Claims can be traced to a source, observation, record, or named stakeholder input.
  • Consent, attribution, and sensitive context have been reviewed.
  • Responsibilities and unresolved follow-up actions are visible.
  • The final record can be understood and reused by someone outside the original activity.

Expected outcome: Human-centred stories that protect dignity while preserving useful program evidence.

Frequently asked questions

When should this resource be used?

Supports respectful storytelling by clarifying consent, representation, risk, attribution, and approval before publication.

What does the resource include?

Consent language, Risk questions, Attribution options, Image-use notes, Approval steps.

What outcome should it support?

Human-centred stories that protect dignity while preserving useful program evidence.